Replacing Laminate Composites with Failure-Governed Lattice Structures

Edge of Practice · Architected Micro-Lattice Structural Systems (AMSS)


Purpose

This entry challenges the prevailing assumption that lightweight, high-performance structural panels must rely on laminate composite architectures with hidden internal failure modes. It proposes a falsifiable alternative: architected micro-lattice sandwich panels whose failure behavior is explicitly governed, progressive, and inspectable.

Practice Gap

Carbon fiber and other laminate composites excel at peak stiffness-to-weight performance but suffer from intrinsic limitations: brittle failure, subsurface delamination, complex inspection, and poor repairability. In safety-critical applications such as EV battery enclosures, these hidden failure modes create lifecycle risk that is managed procedurally rather than structurally.

Current practice treats damage detection as an inspection problem. This proposal treats it as a design problem.

Proposed Structural Alternative

The proposed platform replaces laminate composites with Architected Micro-Lattice Structural Systems (AMSS) — sandwich panels in which load-bearing performance, energy absorption, and failure behavior are determined by a manufacturable micro-scale lattice core mechanically interlocked to thin metallic skins.

First Product Scope

Structural Product: EV battery enclosure panel

This application was selected due to high production volume, strict impact and intrusion requirements, intolerance for hidden damage, and strong economic pressure against carbon fiber.

Structural Architecture

Core

  • Expanded or roll-formed aluminum micro-lattice
  • Feature scale: ~200–1000 μm
  • Stretch-biased topology with intentionally designed crush initiators
  • Manufactured using continuous, automotive-rate processes

Skins

  • Stamped aluminum alloy (AA5xxx / AA6xxx)
  • Thickness: 0.8–1.5 mm depending on intrusion requirements
  • Primary functions: bending stiffness, environmental sealing, impact load spreading

Joining Strategy

  • Mechanical interlocks formed between lattice nodes and skin embossments
  • Structural adhesive film as a secondary, fatigue-friendly load path
  • No welds through bondlines; no reliance on hidden adhesive integrity

Failure Governance Model

Unlike laminate composites, failure in AMSS is designed to be progressive, localized, and legible.

  • Impact energy is absorbed via controlled lattice crushing
  • Failure localizes into bounded zones rather than propagating
  • Skins plastically deform but remain mechanically attached
  • Post-impact damage is visible and geometrically measurable without advanced inspection equipment

The structure does not fail silently. It communicates its state through topology.

Inspection and Repair

AMSS panels are designed for inspection using visual geometry checks and simple depth or deformation gauges. Repair is modular: damaged panels are removed and replaced without curing ovens, composite scrap handling, or subsurface damage uncertainty.

Thermal and Fire Considerations

The lattice architecture enables intentional thermal breaks and integration of ceramic or intumescent barrier layers at the battery interface. Structural integrity is not dependent on adhesive performance during or after thermal runaway events.

Manufacturing Constraints

  • Target cycle time: ≤ 90 seconds per finished panel
  • Continuous lattice feed, automated skin stamping, press lamination, and mechanical locking
  • No sacrificial templates, nanoscale printing, or slow chemical processing steps

Why This Is Edge of Practice

This proposal does not claim universal superiority. It explicitly trades peak material stiffness for inspectability, repairability, and governed failure. It is falsifiable through standardized impact, intrusion, corrosion, and durability testing.

If the lattice fails to control damage localization, survive corrosion, or meet automotive throughput targets, the approach should be rejected.


Back to Edge of Practice Index